Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes pull requests (PRs) generated by five AI coding agents within the AIDev dataset, focusing on the characteristics of their PR descriptions and subsequent human reviewer responses. The study examines structural features of the PR descriptions, reviewer engagement (activity, timing, sentiment), and merge outcomes to understand how different agent styles impact human-AI collaboration. Results show that AI agents exhibit distinct PR description styles that correlate with significant variations in reviewer interaction metrics and merge rates.
AI coding agents have distinct pull request styles that measurably impact how human reviewers respond and whether code gets merged.
The rapid adoption of large language models has led to the emergence of AI coding agents that autonomously create pull requests on GitHub. However, how these agents differ in their pull request description characteristics, and how human reviewers respond to them, remains underexplored. In this study, we conduct an empirical analysis of pull requests created by five AI coding agents using the AIDev dataset. We analyze agent differences in pull request description characteristics, including structural features, and examine human reviewer response in terms of review activity, response timing, sentiment, and merge outcomes. We find that AI coding agents exhibit distinct PR description styles, which are associated with differences in reviewer engagement, response time, and merge outcomes. We observe notable variation across agents in both reviewer interaction metrics and merge rates. These findings highlight the role of pull request presentation and reviewer interaction dynamics in human-AI collaborative software development.
