Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the governance challenges posed by educational AI systems that exert epistemic authority without the accountability mechanisms of human educators. It proposes the Open Cognitive Graph (OCG) as a technical interface to externalize pedagogical structure, making the AI's cognitive logic inspectable and revisable. The authors introduce a "trunk-branch" governance model to organize epistemic authority across layers of consensus and pluralism, using a community-governed educational foundation model as a case study.
Educational AI's "black box" problem isn't just about model transparency, but about governing the epistemic authority these systems wield, demanding a new approach beyond simple regulation.
Through widespread use in formative assessment and self-directed learning, educational AI systems exercise de facto epistemic authority. Unlike human educators, however, these systems are not embedded in institutional mechanisms of accountability, review, and correction, creating a structural governance challenge that cannot be resolved through application-level regulation or model transparency alone. This paper reconceptualizes educational AI as public educational cognitive infrastructure and argues that its governance must address the epistemic authority such systems exert. We propose the Open Cognitive Graph (OCG) as a technical interface that externalizes pedagogical structure in forms aligned with human educational reasoning. By explicitly representing concepts, prerequisite relations, misconceptions, and scaffolding, OCGs make the cognitive logic governing AI behaviour inspectable and revisable. Building on this foundation, we introduce the trunk-branch governance model, which organizes epistemic authority across layers of consensus and pluralism. A case study of a community-governed educational foundation model demonstrates how distributed expertise can be integrated through institutionalized processes of validation, correction, and propagation. The paper concludes by discussing implications for educational equity, AI policy, and sustainability. By shifting attention from access to governance conditions, the proposed framework offers a structural approach to aligning educational AI with democratic accountability and public responsibility.
