Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates the dynamics of biased ratings in digital economy platforms using an evolutionary game theoretical model to analyze how platforms can perpetuate or counteract rating-based discrimination. It focuses on the trade-off between promoting highly-rated providers (benefiting users) and supporting marginalized providers facing rating bias. The key finding is that intervening by tuning the demographics of search results is an effective way to reduce unfairness with minimal impact on user experience, even without precise measurements of rating bias.
Counterintuitively, platforms can reduce discrimination in rating systems by tuning search result demographics, even without precise knowledge of the rating bias affecting marginalized service providers.
The digital services economy consists of online platforms that facilitate interactions between service providers and consumers. This ecosystem is characterized by short-term, often one-off, transactions between parties that have no prior familiarity. To establish trust among users, platforms employ rating systems which allow users to report on the quality of their previous interactions. However, while arguably crucial for these platforms to function, rating systems can perpetuate negative biases against marginalised groups. This paper investigates how to design platforms around biased reputation systems, reducing discrimination while maintaining incentives for all service providers to offer high quality service for users. We introduce an evolutionary game theoretical model to study how digital platforms can perpetuate or counteract rating-based discrimination. We focus on the platforms'decisions to promote service providers who have high reputations or who belong to a specific protected group. Our results demonstrate a fundamental trade-off between user experience and fairness: promoting highly-rated providers benefits users, but lowers the demand for marginalised providers against which the ratings are biased. Our results also provide evidence that intervening by tuning the demographics of the search results is a highly effective way of reducing unfairness while minimally impacting users. Furthermore, we show that even when precise measurements on the level of rating bias affecting marginalised service providers is unavailable, there is still potential to improve upon a recommender system which ignores protected characteristics. Altogether, our model highlights the benefits of proactive anti-discrimination design in systems where ratings are used to promote cooperative behaviour.
