Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces an autonomous robotic ultrasound (RUS) workflow for efficient 3D kidney imaging using template-guided optimal pivoting. The method registers partial kidney observations from an initial exploratory scan to a kidney template to estimate organ pose and then performs a fixed-point pivoting sweep aligned with the kidney's long axis. Experiments in simulation and in-vivo demonstrate improved kidney localization accuracy and a 75mm reduction in probe footprint compared to baseline methods, validating the approach for spatially efficient volumetric sweeps.
Achieve 75mm shorter probe footprints in robotic kidney ultrasound by using a template-guided pivoting strategy that minimizes unnecessary probe translation.
Medical ultrasound (US) imaging is a frontline tool for the diagnosis of kidney diseases. However, traditional freehand imaging procedure suffers from inconsistent, operator-dependent outcomes, lack of 3D localization information, and risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. While robotic ultrasound (RUS) systems offer the potential for standardized, operator-independent 3D kidney data acquisition, the existing scanning methods lack the ability to determine the optimal imaging window for efficient imaging. As a result, the scan is often blindly performed with excessive probe footprint, which frequently leads to acoustic shadowing and incomplete organ coverage. Consequently, there is a critical need for a spatially efficient imaging technique that can maximize the kidney coverage through minimum probe footprint. Here, we propose an autonomous workflow to achieve efficient kidney imaging via template-guided optimal pivoting. The system first performs an explorative imaging to generate partial observations of the kidney. This data is then registered to a kidney template to estimate the organ pose. With the kidney localized, the robot executes a fixed-point pivoting sweep where the imaging plane is aligned with the kidney long axis to minimize the probe translation. The proposed method was validated in simulation and in-vivo. Simulation results indicate that a 60% exploration ratio provides optimal balance between kidney localization accuracy and scanning efficiency. In-vivo evaluation on two male subjects demonstrates a kidney localization accuracy up to 7.36 mm and 13.84 degrees. Moreover, the optimal pivoting approach shortened the probe footprint by around 75 mm when compared with the baselines. These results valid our approach of leveraging anatomical templates to align the probe optimally for volumetric sweep.
