Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper operationalizes the Superficial Alignment Hypothesis (SAH) by defining task complexity as the length of the shortest program achieving target performance, arguing that pre-training significantly reduces this complexity. They unify previous SAH arguments by framing them as strategies for finding short programs. Experiments on mathematical reasoning, machine translation, and instruction following demonstrate that while pre-training enables strong performance, post-training drastically reduces the program size (complexity) needed to achieve it, often requiring only a few kilobytes.
Post-training LLMs is more about finding the right "key" (a few kilobytes of parameters) to unlock pre-existing knowledge than learning new information.
The superficial alignment hypothesis (SAH) posits that large language models learn most of their knowledge during pre-training, and that post-training merely surfaces this knowledge. The SAH, however, lacks a precise definition, which has led to (i) different and seemingly orthogonal arguments supporting it, and (ii) important critiques to it. We propose a new metric called task complexity: the length of the shortest program that achieves a target performance on a task. In this framework, the SAH simply claims that pre-trained models drastically reduce the complexity of achieving high performance on many tasks. Our definition unifies prior arguments supporting the SAH, interpreting them as different strategies to find such short programs. Experimentally, we estimate the task complexity of mathematical reasoning, machine translation, and instruction following; we then show that these complexities can be remarkably low when conditioned on a pre-trained model. Further, we find that pre-training enables access to strong performances on our tasks, but it can require programs of gigabytes of length to access them. Post-training, on the other hand, collapses the complexity of reaching this same performance by several orders of magnitude. Overall, our results highlight that task adaptation often requires surprisingly little information -- often just a few kilobytes.
