Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a methodology for detecting and quantifying information voids by analyzing the interplay between information supply and demand across multiple online platforms. The study uses longitudinal data from Facebook, Google, Twitter, Wikipedia, and news outlets during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in six European countries to identify periods with limited reliable information. The key finding is that information voids correlate with a decline in high-quality information and a higher prevalence of misinformation, suggesting their role in the spread of low-quality content.
Information voids, periods starved of reliable information, are shown to be hotspots for misinformation, empirically linking information scarcity to the spread of low-quality content online.
The model of the attention economy, where content producers compete for the attention of users, relies on two key forces: information supply and demand. This study leverages the feedback loop between these forces to develop a method for detecting and quantifying information voids, i.e., periods in which little or no reliable information is available on a given topic. Using a case study on COVID-19 vaccines rollout in six European countries, and drawing on data from multiple platforms including Facebook, Google, Twitter, Wikipedia, and online news outlets, we examine how information voids emerge, persist and correlate with a decline in the proportion of high-quality information circulating online. By conceptualising information voids as a specific regime of information spreading, we also quantify their counterpart, information overabundance, which constitute a central component of the current definition of infodemic. We show that information voids are associated with a higher prevalence of misinformation, thus representing problematic hotspots in which individuals are more likely to be misled by low-quality online content. Overall, our findings provide empirical support for the inclusion of information voids in mechanistic explanations of misinformation emergence.
