Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel pruning method for order-based causal structure learning that leverages sparse additive models to directly identify and remove spurious edges in the DAG. By circumventing the need for hypothesis testing inherent in CAM-pruning, the proposed method mitigates computational bottlenecks and reduces the risk of errors due to multiple testing. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the approach achieves significant speedups while maintaining or improving accuracy compared to existing pruning techniques.
Ditch the computational bottleneck of traditional CAM-pruning: sparse additive models offer a faster, more accurate way to learn causal structures.
Causal structure learning, also known as causal discovery, aims to estimate causal relationships between variables as a form of a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG) from observational data. One of the major frameworks is the order-based approach that first estimates a topological order of the underlying DAG and then prunes spurious edges from the fully-connected DAG induced by the estimated topological order. Previous studies often focus on the former ordering step because it can dramatically reduce the search space of DAGs. In practice, the latter pruning step is equally crucial for ensuring both computational efficiency and estimation accuracy. Most existing methods employ a pruning technique based on generalized additive models and hypothesis testing, commonly known as CAM-pruning. However, this approach can be a computational bottleneck as it requires repeatedly fitting additive models for all variables. Furthermore, it may harm estimation quality due to multiple testing. To address these issues, we introduce a new pruning method based on sparse additive models, which enables direct pruning of redundant edges without relying on hypothesis testing. We propose an efficient algorithm for learning sparse additive models by combining the randomized tree embedding technique with group-wise sparse regression. Experimental results on both synthetic and real datasets demonstrated that our method is significantly faster than existing pruning methods while maintaining comparable or superior accuracy.
