Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of bounding probabilities of causation when only partial causal diagrams are available, a common scenario in real-world applications. They formulate the problem as an optimization program that incorporates available structural and statistical information as constraints. The result is a general framework that yields tighter and formally valid bounds on probabilities of causation, even without full identifiability.
Unlock individual-level causal reasoning in the real world, even with incomplete causal knowledge, using tighter bounds on probabilities of causation.
Probabilities of causation are fundamental to individual-level explanation and decision making, yet they are inherently counterfactual and not point-identifiable from data in general. Existing bounds either disregard available covariates, require complete causal graphs, or rely on restrictive binary settings, limiting their practical use. In real-world applications, causal information is often partial but nontrivial. This paper proposes a general framework for bounding probabilities of causation using partial causal information. We show how the available structural or statistical information can be systematically incorporated as constraints in a optimization programming formulation, yielding tighter and formally valid bounds without full identifiability. This approach extends the applicability of probabilities of causation to realistic settings where causal knowledge is incomplete but informative.
