Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the specific capabilities improved by reinforcement learning (RL) in vision-language models for visual reasoning, compared to supervised fine-tuning. They introduce a "Frankenstein-style" analysis framework involving causal probing, parameter comparison, and model merging to isolate RL's effects. The key finding is that RL primarily induces a consistent inference-time shift in mid-to-late transformer layers, refining vision-to-reasoning alignment rather than uniformly enhancing visual perception.
RL's secret sauce for visual reasoning isn't better vision, but a targeted refinement of mid-to-late transformer layers that aligns vision with reasoning.
Reinforcement learning (RL) with verifiable rewards has become a standard post-training stage for boosting visual reasoning in vision-language models, yet it remains unclear what capabilities RL actually improves compared with supervised fine-tuning as cold-start initialization (IN). End-to-end benchmark gains conflate multiple factors, making it difficult to attribute improvements to specific skills. To bridge the gap, we propose a Frankenstein-style analysis framework including: (i) functional localization via causal probing; (ii) update characterization via parameter comparison; and (iii) transferability test via model merging. Instead, RL induces a consistent inference-time shift primarily in mid-to-late layers, and these mid-to-late refinements are both transferable (via merging) and necessary (via freezing) for RL gains. Overall, our results suggest that RL's reliable contribution in visual reasoning is not a uniform enhancement of visual perception, but a systematic refinement of mid-to-late transformer computation that improves vision-to-reasoning alignment and reasoning performance, highlighting the limitations of benchmark-only evaluation for understanding multimodal reasoning improvements.
