Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
LIPPEN is introduced as a hardware-software co-design that encrypts pointers in-place, leveraging the entire 64-bit pointer field for cryptographic binding to the execution context. This approach maximizes entropy and eliminates brute-force weaknesses associated with truncated authentication codes like ARM PAC, while maintaining binary compatibility. Evaluation on FPGA using RISC-V cores demonstrates that LIPPEN achieves comprehensive pointer protection with runtime overhead comparable to PAC-based schemes and negligible area/power overhead.
Get strong pointer integrity and confidentiality without metadata overhead: LIPPEN encrypts pointers in-place, turning every pointer into a cryptographically protected block.
Memory-safety violations in C and C++ programs continue to enable sophisticated exploitation techniques such as control-flow hijacking and data-oriented attacks. Existing hardware defenses either rely on address space layout randomization (ASLR) or attach explicit metadata to pointers to verify their integrity. External metadata schemes provide strong guarantees, but incur additional memory accesses and memory footprint overhead. In-place authentication mechanisms, such as ARM Pointer Authentication (PAC), achieve low overhead at the cost of limited entropy and susceptibility to brute-force and reuse attacks. This paper presents LIPPEN, a hardware-software co-design for full-pointer encryption that provides strong pointer integrity and confidentiality with zero metadata overhead. LIPPEN treats every pointer as an encrypted block, cryptographically binding it to its execution context and decrypting it transparently at dereference time. By re-purposing the entire 64-bit pointer field for encryption rather than preserving raw address bits, LIPPEN maximizes entropy, eliminates the brute-force weaknesses of truncated authentication codes, and maintains binary compatibility with existing PAC-enabled software. We prototype LIPPEN on FPGA using 64-bit RISC-V Rocket and BOOM cores, and evaluate it with microbenchmarks, nbench, and SPEC CPU2017. We compare against both an in-house RISC-V PAC implementation and Apple's PAC on the M1 processor. Across these workloads, LIPPEN provides comprehensive pointer protection with runtime overhead comparable to PAC-based schemes, while incurring negligible area and power overhead. These results show that LIPPEN is a practical design point for deploying strong pointer protection in real processors.
