Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This narrative review examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting and diagnosing precocious puberty (PP) by integrating clinical, hormonal, imaging, lifestyle, and environmental data. The review covers AI models like XGBoost, random forest, and convolutional neural networks, highlighting their use in automated bone age assessment and risk stratification. The authors conclude that AI offers a promising approach for earlier, non-invasive risk assessment in PP, but progress depends on larger datasets and ethical model development.
AI models show potential for earlier and non-invasive risk assessment in precocious puberty, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing reliance on invasive testing.
Background/Objectives: Precocious puberty (PP), defined as the onset of secondary sexual characteristics before 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys, is associated with psychosocial distress, compromised adult height, and long-term metabolic risk. Early identification remains challenging, as current diagnostic approaches are largely reactive and rely on invasive or resource-intensive testing. This narrative review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can support earlier risk prediction and detection of PP through integration of clinical, hormonal, imaging, lifestyle, and environmental data. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2025. Eligible studies included original research and high-quality reviews that examined AI-based approaches, such as machine learning and deep learning, in pediatric endocrinology, particularly for the prediction or diagnosis of central or peripheral precocious puberty. Studies incorporating clinical, hormonal, radiological, lifestyle, environmental, or multi-omics data relevant to AI modeling were included. Results: AI models, including XGBoost, random forest, convolutional neural networks, and regression-based approaches, have demonstrated potential utility in predicting central precocious puberty using hormonal, imaging, and growth data. Reported applications include automated bone age assessment, lifestyle and dietary risk stratification, and exploratory use of wearable-derived behavioral data. However, progress is limited by small pediatric datasets, population bias, limited interpretability, and unresolved ethical challenges related to privacy, consent, and equity. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence represents a promising decision-support approach for earlier, non-invasive, and individualized risk assessment in precocious puberty. Future progress will depend on the integration of longitudinal, multimodal data, the development of ethical models, and interdisciplinary collaboration among pediatric endocrinologists, data scientists, and public health stakeholders.
