Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the emergence of planning behavior in model-free reinforcement learning (RL) by examining the role of relational hidden states in neural architectures. The authors demonstrate that a network utilizing relational hidden states can effectively recover the environment's transition structure and facilitate planning, leading to improved decision-making. In contrast, a control agent lacking this relational binding fails to exhibit planning behavior, suggesting that the architecture's hidden-state structure is crucial for emergent planning in RL.
Relational hidden states in neural networks can unlock emergent planning capabilities in model-free reinforcement learning, challenging traditional distinctions between model-based and model-free methods.
Reinforcement learning is conventionally divided into model-based and model-free methods. In this taxonomy, model-based methods perform lookahead planning over a learned world model, whereas model-free methods learn a reactive state-action mapping. Recent work, however, has shown that planning can emerge from model-free reinforcement learning alone. The conditions under which this behavior emerges from a pure reward-maximization objective have so far remained unclear. In this paper, we present evidence that, in the observed cases, the hidden-state structure of the neural architecture is the deciding factor. We find that a network of relational hidden states, each anchored to an environment state and exchanging messages along learned relations, acquires a planning mechanism. These hidden states recover the environment's transition structure in their learned relations, and improve the policy at decision time by planning over the learned graph. In a matched control agent that must additionally discover which cells represent which states, no such binding arises, and no planning follows from it. We argue that this explains the observed phenomenon of emergent planning in model-free reinforcement learning and raises the question of how common such emergent planning might be more generally. Finally, we hypothesize that the discovered mechanism could describe how planning emerges from pure reward maximization in the human brain through a neural architectural prior.