Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the challenges of command issuance in UAV-UGV cooperative systems by introducing a confidence-gated framework that utilizes interpretable reliability proxies from vision-based heading predictions. The proposed method leverages bounding-box area and heading stability to determine when to trust predictions, effectively balancing execution rate and command accuracy. Evaluation on a real UAV-UGV dataset demonstrates that the confidence gating significantly enhances command-level behavior, particularly in low-confidence scenarios, compared to traditional policies.
Trusting vision predictions isn't enough; a confidence-gated approach can dramatically enhance UAV-UGV command accuracy in uncertain environments.
Vision-based heading prediction is useful for UAV--UGV cooperation, but accurate prediction alone does not guarantee that every predicted heading should be issued directly as a control command. This paper investigates the decision problem of when and how a fixed vision-based heading predictor should be trusted for command issuance. A lightweight confidence-gated framework is proposed in which execution decisions are made using two interpretable reliability proxies derived from the perception stream: bounding-box area as a visibility-related proxy and short-window variation in predicted heading as a stability-related proxy. During low-confidence intervals, the framework compares the baseline freeze-HOLD policy with a bounded-blend fallback that updates the issued command conservatively. The method is evaluated on a real UAV--UGV dataset under clean and perturbed conditions. The results show that confidence gating creates a clear trade-off among execution rate, executed-frame accuracy, issued-command accuracy, and smoothness. The results further show that sparse execution can cause severe stale-command error under the baseline freeze-HOLD policy, whereas the bounded-blend fallback substantially improves command-level behavior under the same gate decisions. These findings highlight that reliable perception-driven autonomy depends not only on prediction accuracy, but also on decision-aware command issuance during low-confidence