Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces capability-sustaining emotional dialogue (CSED) as a new longitudinal research paradigm aimed at enhancing users' emotional regulation and social connection over time. By auditing existing literature, the authors reveal that 95% of current emotional support systems focus solely on immediate relief, neglecting the long-term impacts on user autonomy and capability. The study presents a framework that links user capabilities to design commitments and evaluation metrics, paving the way for more effective emotional support systems that prioritize sustained user development.
95% of emotional support systems prioritize immediate relief over long-term user capability, highlighting a critical gap in current research and practice.
Emotional dialogue research includes two influential strategy traditions. Empathetic dialogue prioritizes understanding a speaker's emotional experience. Emotional support conversation selects and sequences support for the seeker's current needs. Sustained use introduces a further goal. Effective support should sustain users' capacities for emotion regulation, coping, self-endorsed decisions, and social connection across the interaction lifecycle. We propose capability-sustaining emotional dialogue (CSED) as a longitudinal research paradigm that aligns supportive strategy with this goal and organizes data, models, system design, evaluation, and governance around repeated use, non-use, transition, and termination. A targeted literature-and-corpus audit motivates this position. In a PRISMA-ScR-guided sample, 95% of 60 system-building papers pursue relief-oriented goals. None evaluates capability or longitudinal outcomes, and only 1 considers dependency, autonomy, or termination risk. In 300 ESConv supporter turns, capability-relevant functions appear in 43.0%, while generic suggestions account for 22.0%, compared with 4.0% reappraisal, 6.7% self-efficacy support, and 0.3% boundary behavior. We release a protocol for extending the audit to model behavior. An illustrative process model connects latent user capability to six design commitments, four evaluation timescales, and lifecycle constraints. The resulting agenda makes CSED testable across data, policy design, training, evaluation, and governance.
