Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Vera, an automated safety testing framework designed to address the evolving safety risks associated with LLM agents performing autonomous actions. By implementing a three-stage pipeline that includes risk discovery, combinatorial safety case generation, and adaptive execution in isolated environments, Vera enables rigorous evaluation of safety weaknesses in agent frameworks. The evaluation of Vera on four production agent systems revealed alarming attack success rates of up to 93.9%, underscoring the critical need for scalable safety testing in AI systems.
Vera reveals that existing LLM agents exhibit up to 93.9% vulnerability to multi-channel attacks, highlighting a significant gap in current safety evaluations.
LLM agents increasingly perform autonomous actions through external tools, leading to complex and evolving safety risks. However, existing safety testing targets expert-designed safety violations, and the corresponding outcomes are evaluated by hard-coded rules, making them costly to extend as agents evolve. To this end, we present Vera, an end-to-end automated safety testing framework that instantiates software engineering testing principles for non-deterministic agents through a three-stage, self-reinforcing pipeline. First, a literature-driven exploration continuously discovers and structures emerging risks into taxonomies of safety risks, attack methods, and tool execution environments. Second, combinatorial composition across taxonomy dimensions produces executable safety cases, each specifying a concrete safety goal, a programmatically constructed initial state, and a deterministic verification predicate grounded in observable artifacts. Third, adaptive execution runs heterogeneous agents in isolated sandboxes where a control agent steers multi-turn interaction based on runtime observations, while evidence-grounded verifiers judge outcomes from environment state and tool-call evidence rather than model self-report. We evaluate Vera on four production agent frameworks (OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Claude Code), revealing substantial safety weaknesses, with average attack success rates reaching 93.9\% under multi-channel attacks; we also release Vera-Bench, comprising 1600 executable safety cases spanning 124 risk categories across three execution settings. These results indicate that modular, executable testing infrastructure is essential for rigorous and maintainable safety evaluation of rapidly evolving agentic systems at scale. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/Yunhao-Feng/Vera.
