Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of deep representation learning in single-cell clustering by benchmarking nine clustering pipelines across ten real datasets, integrating advanced techniques like hyperparameter optimization and sensitivity analysis. The findings reveal that while contrastive autoencoders achieve the highest mean Adjusted Rand Index, classical PCA methods remain competitive in scenarios where linear projections suffice. The research identifies specific dataset characteristics that dictate the performance of different methods, providing a nuanced decision framework for practitioners in biomedical AI.
Deep learning isn't always the answer; classical PCA can outperform complex models in certain single-cell clustering scenarios.
Single-cell ribonucleic acid sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a foundational technology for precision-medicine workflows that contribute to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3 on Good Health and Well-being, and unsupervised clustering is the analytical step that turns raw expression matrices into interpretable cell populations. Practitioners therefore face a recurring engineering decision: is an additional deep representation stage worth its compute and tuning cost, or do classical principal component analysis (PCA) pipelines already suffice? We address this question with a diagnostic benchmark of nine clustering pipelines on ten real datasets (90-5,685 cells, 19,046-41,480 genes, 4-11 cell types), augmented by a partial scVI V2 specialized comparison on seven datasets. The protocol integrates Optuna hyperparameter search, repeated-run robustness, Friedman/Wilcoxon-Holm/TOST testing, and Sobol total-order sensitivity analysis. The contrastive autoencoder achieved the highest mean Adjusted Rand Index (0.7872), but Holm-corrected tests did not establish dominance over the strongest baselines. Per-dataset analysis reveals three reproducible regimes: probabilistic variational autoencoder (VAE) variants help on the smallest datasets, deep autoencoders win on mid-scale data with multi-batch or many-type structure, and classical PCA pipelines remain competitive when linear projection already captures the dominant variation. Sobol indices identify learning rate ($S_T=0.70$) and latent dimensionality ($S_T=0.56$) as the dominant variance contributors, indicating where limited tuning budgets should be allocated. The contribution is therefore a dataset-aware and compute-conscious decision framework for biomedical AI pipelines supporting sustainable healthcare analytics, rather than a universal superiority claim.
