Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the shifting bottleneck behavior in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, revealing that upstream reranking can become the primary bottleneck under specific conditions. To mitigate this issue, the authors introduce PACE, a training-free framework that combines evidence frontloading with pressure-adaptive budgeting, optimizing the selection of documents based on their relevance and utility for multi-hop evidence chains. Experimental results demonstrate that PACE enhances evidence recall and reduces latency, showing that prioritizing fewer, more relevant documents can lead to improved overall performance in RAG systems.
Evidence-dense top-ranked candidates can significantly boost recall while using fewer reranked documents, challenging conventional wisdom in RAG efficiency.
Existing methods for improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) efficiency mainly optimize downstream LLM generation, such as context compression or serving optimization. However, RAG is an end-to-end system, and its bottleneck can shift between upstream reranking and downstream generation under different serving loads and reranking budgets.In this paper, we first empirically characterize this shifting-bottleneck behavior and show that upstream reranking can become the dominant bottleneck under high query rates or large reranking budgets. Reducing the reranking budget can relieve this bottleneck, but it may also drop supporting evidence and degrade recall. To address this problem, we propose \textbf{\textsf{PACE}} (\textbf{P}rioritized \textbf{A}daptive \textbf{C}overage of \textbf{E}vidence), a training-free framework that combines \textit{evidence frontloading} with \textit{pressure-adaptive budgeting}. \textsf{PACE} first reorders candidates by marginal evidence coverage, prioritizing documents that are query-relevant, complementary, and useful for forming multi-hop evidence chains. We show that this objective is monotone submodular, giving greedy selection a $(1-1/e)$ approximation guarantee. \textsf{PACE} then dynamically adjusts the reranking budget according to the relative pressure of the reranker and the LLM. Experiments on three multi-hop QA datasets and online serving simulations show that \textsf{PACE} improves evidence recall, reduces p95 latency under ranking-heavy workloads. More importantly, the two components together reveal that \textit{less can be more}: an evidence-dense top-ranked candidates enable higher final recall with fewer reranked documents.
