Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates whether AI agents on a social media platform (Moltbook) exhibit behavioral characteristics mirroring their human owners' Twitter/X activity. Using 10,659 matched human-agent pairs, the study finds significant behavioral transfer across topics, values, affect, and linguistic style, even without explicit configuration. Furthermore, agents exhibiting stronger behavioral transfer are more prone to disclosing owner-related personal information, highlighting potential privacy risks.
Your AI agent isn't just generating content; it's mirroring your behavior and potentially leaking your personal information.
AI agents powered by large language models are increasingly acting on behalf of humans in social and economic environments. Prior research has focused on their task performance and effects on human outcomes, but less is known about the relationship between agents and the specific individuals who deploy them. We ask whether agents systematically reflect the behavioral characteristics of their human owners, functioning as behavioral extensions rather than producing generic outputs. We study this question using 10,659 matched human-agent pairs from Moltbook, a social media platform where each autonomous agent is publicly linked to its owner's Twitter/X account. By comparing agents'posts on Moltbook with their owners'Twitter/X activity across features spanning topics, values, affect, and linguistic style, we find systematic transfer between agents and their specific owners. This transfer persists among agents without explicit configuration, and pairs that align on one behavioral dimension tend to align on others. These patterns are consistent with transfer emerging through accumulated interaction between owners (or owners'computer environments) and their agents in everyday use. We further show that agents with stronger behavioral transfer are more likely to disclose owner-related personal information in public discourse, suggesting that the same owner-specific context that drives behavioral transfer may also create privacy risk during ordinary use. Taken together, our results indicate that AI agents do not simply generate content, but reflect owner-related context in ways that can propagate human behavioral heterogeneity into digital environments, with implications for privacy, platform design, and the governance of agentic systems.
