Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Praxy Voice, a method for achieving commercial-class Indic text-to-speech (TTS) using a frozen, non-Indic base model (Chatterbox) without any commercial training data. The approach combines a Brahmic Unified Phoneme Space (BUPS) for romanization, a LoRA adapter trained on licensed Indic audio using a Hindi-proxy language ID, and a voice-prompt recovery recipe. Evaluations on Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi show that Praxy Voice matches or slightly outperforms commercial baselines on phonological dimensions and LLM-WER, even improving code-mixing performance with a third branch using IndicF5.
Achieve near-native Indic TTS from a non-Indic base model at zero commercial-training-data cost by cleverly combining phoneme space unification, LoRA adaptation, and voice-prompt recovery.
Commercial TTS systems produce near-native Indic audio, but the best open-source bases (Chatterbox, Indic Parler-TTS, IndicF5) trail them on measured phonological dimensions, and the most widely adopted multilingual base (Chatterbox, 23 languages) does not even tokenise Telugu or Tamil. We ask: what is the minimum intervention that brings such a non-Indic-native base to commercial-class output on Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi, without training a new acoustic decoder and without any commercial TTS training data? We combine three pieces: (1) BUPS, a Brahmic Unified Phoneme Space that deterministically romanises seven Indic scripts to ISO-15919 so Chatterbox's Latin tokeniser can process them; (2) a LoRA adapter on only the text-token predictor (Chatterbox's t3), trained on ~1,220h of licensed Indic audio with a Hindi-proxy language_id; (3) a voice-prompt recovery recipe -- an 8-11s same-language reference clip plus three sampling overrides (exaggeration 0.7, temperature 0.6, min_p 0.1;"Config B") -- that recovers commercial-class acoustic output with no acoustic-decoder training. On Hindi, the LoRA regresses accuracy and we instead use vanilla Chatterbox + Config B, giving a two-branch deployment. Evaluated on 10-utterance pilot sets with the companion PSP benchmark, Praxy Voice matches or slightly leads commercial baselines: 26.7% retroflex collapse on Telugu (vs Sarvam Bulbul 33.3%), 71% Tamil-zha collapse (vs commercial trio's 86%), 0.025 LLM-WER on Hindi (tied with Cartesia Sonic-3). For intra-sentential code-mix we add a third branch (IndicF5 + native-script transliteration) that drops code-mix LLM-WER from 0.80-0.85 to 0.14-0.27 across Hi/Te/Ta. We release R6 LoRA weights (Apache-2.0), inference code and router (MIT), and a Gradio demo.
