Track trials, findings, and clinical evidence as it lands.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study addresses the challenge of accurately labeling minute-resolution athlete monitoring data in the context of injury association by introducing a fixed-landmark approach that generates a single representation per athlete-session. By evaluating injury status at predetermined time points, the method avoids the pitfalls of minute-level supervision and allows for a more nuanced understanding of injury onset as more information becomes available. The analysis of 3,743 athlete-sessions reveals that while cumulative and dynamic representations improve discrimination, the overall performance remains uncertain, highlighting the complexity of injury prediction in sports contexts.
A novel fixed-landmark approach reveals that injury association discrimination improves with more session data, yet uncertainty persists in predictions.
Athlete monitoring data may be recorded minute by minute throughout a match or training session, while injury information may only indicate whether the entire session was injury-associated. This creates a modelling problem: assigning the same session-level label to every minute would imply that injury status is known at each exact time, even though within-session injury onset is unknown. Our novelty is a fixed-landmark, one-representation-per-athlete-session formulation that directly addresses this mismatch. Instead of labelling every minute, we construct one representation per athlete-session at each landmark using information observed up to that point. This keeps the target at the session level and avoids unsupported minute-level injury supervision. A landmark is a fixed time point within the same session, such as 10, 20, or 30 minutes. At each landmark, we assess whether the whole session is injury-associated or non-injury-associated and examine how discrimination changes as more within-session information becomes available. Using 2020 SoccerMon data, we analyse 3,743 athlete-sessions from 48 elite women's football athletes, including 22 injury-associated sessions from five athletes. We evaluate pre-session, cumulative, dynamic, and combined representations with athlete-disjoint validation, athlete-cluster bootstrap uncertainty, common-cohort sensitivity analysis, alternative negative-athlete fold allocations, equal-athlete weighting, and Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost benchmarks. Primary CUM+DYN Logistic Regression yields ROC-AUC 0.367-0.607 and PR-AUC 0.0080-0.0150 across landmarks, with wide uncertainty. PRE-containing representations show higher point estimates at several landmarks but remain uncertain.