Track trials, findings, and clinical evidence as it lands.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multi-view inspection framework for reflective smartphone cover glass that addresses the challenges of defect visibility and spatial ambiguity by utilizing a vision-language model (VLM) and a normal-reference reconstruction branch. The approach combines class-aware semantic boxes with class-agnostic saliency to enhance the ranking of semantic proposals without altering their coordinates. The method demonstrates a significant improvement in defect detection performance, with an increase in average precision from 52.6% to 62.6% and a recall boost from 75.5% to 88.3% across multiple views, highlighting the effectiveness of semantic-saliency cross-verification in this context.
Semantic-saliency cross-verification boosts defect detection accuracy in reflective surfaces by over 10 percentage points, revealing the power of multi-view analysis.
Reflective smartphone cover glass is challenging to inspect from a single fixed viewpoint because defect visibility varies with viewing geometry and specular reflections. This gives rise to two practical challenges: defects may be weakly observable from certain viewpoints, while the available visual evidence may remain spatially ambiguous. To address these issues, we propose a multi-view inspection framework in which each RGB observation is processed by a shared per-view expert. A vision-language model (VLM) produces class-aware semantic boxes, while a normal-reference reconstruction branch provides class-agnostic saliency. Their spatial agreement is used as supporting evidence to rank semantic proposals without modifying their coordinates or treating saliency as ground truth. The resulting evidence records are combined at product level without cross-view registration. On 282 production-line images, semantic-saliency association improves $AP_{50}$ from 52.6% to 62.6% by re-ranking fixed semantic proposals. Across 94 products, cross-view evidence recall $R_{\rm prod}@0.5$ increases from 75.5% for the best single view to 88.3% using all three views. These results support the complementary roles of semantic-saliency cross-verification and additional optical observations in reflective-surface inspection.