Track trials, findings, and clinical evidence as it lands.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces InteractWeb-Bench, a new multimodal interactive benchmark designed to evaluate website generation agents under realistic, non-expert user conditions with ambiguous and potentially contradictory instructions. It simulates diverse user behaviors through persona-driven instruction perturbations and provides an interactive execution environment with actions for clarification, implementation, verification, and submission. Experiments demonstrate that current MLLM-based agents struggle with "blind execution" due to limitations in intent recognition and adaptive interaction when faced with these realistic user inputs.
Today's best multimodal agents still fall into "blind execution" traps when building websites from ambiguous, non-expert user instructions, highlighting a critical gap in intent recognition and adaptive interaction.
With the advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and coding agents, the website development has shifted from manual programming to agent-based project-level code synthesis. Existing benchmarks rely on idealized assumptions, especially for well-structured, information-rich inputs and static execution settings. In contrast, real-world development is constrained by a critical bottleneck: the semantic misalignment between ambiguous, low-quality instructions from non-expert users and model understanding, which results in a failure mode that we term blind execution. To address this gap, we introduce InteractWeb-Bench, the first multimodal interactive benchmark for website generation under non-expert low-code user conditions. InteractWeb-Bench introduces four types of user agents and persona-driven instruction perturbations to systematically simulate diverse user behaviors, including ambiguity, redundancy, and contradiction, grounded in requirement engineering defect taxonomies. We develop an interactive execution environment for agents, featuring a unified action space comprising Clarify, Implement, Verify, and Submit, enabling iterative intent refinement, code synthesis, and visual feedback-based validation. Extensive experiments and analysis reveal that frontier MLLM-based agents remain trapped in blind execution, exposing limitations in intent recognition and adaptive interaction.