Track new results across pure and applied mathematics.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces KaliBench, a novel fine-grained benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to translate natural language into executable CLI commands for cybersecurity tools on Kali Linux, addressing the critical gap in assessing practical tool invocation accuracy. The benchmark comprises 8,504 query-command pairs across 1,642 tools, evaluated using a multi-stage verification pipeline including sandboxed execution and runtime-free verifiable rewards. Results show that even large open-weight models struggle with exact-command accuracy, achieving below 42% in unrestricted settings, but supervised fine-tuning and RL with KaliBench rewards significantly boost smaller models to competitive performance.
Even the largest open-weight LLMs fail to generate accurate cybersecurity CLI commands over 58% of the time, but fine-tuning with verifiable rewards on KaliBench closes the gap with massive MoE models.
LLMs are increasingly applied to cybersecurity workflows, where they are expected to translate analysts'intent into tool invocations. However, existing evaluations focus on knowledge-based assessments or end-to-end agentic tasks, and do not directly measure LLMs'ability to generate executable commands for real-world cybersecurity tools. This gap is critical because cybersecurity operations rely on strict command-line interfaces (CLIs), where minor syntax errors, incorrect flag--value bindings, or argument misordering can invalidate execution. We introduce KaliBench, a fine-grained benchmark and dataset for natural-language--to--CLI translation on Kali Linux, comprising 8,504 query--command pairs spanning 1,642 tools across 23 capability dimensions and 5 security phases. KaliBench is constructed via a manuscript-grounded pipeline with deterministic canonicalization and alias-aware evaluation, enabling precise and reproducible assessment of tool selection and argument construction. To ensure both semantic correctness and practical executability, we develop a multi-stage verification pipeline that combines LLM-based validation, sandboxed terminal execution, and human-in-the-loop refinement. Building on these fine-grained, deterministic signals, KaliBench further enables runtime-free verifiable rewards for training. Across three evaluation modes and 24 configurations of general-purpose and security-focused open-weight models, no open-weight model exceeds 42% exact-command accuracy in the unrestricted setting, highlighting the difficulty of accurate CLI-based cybersecurity tool use without explicit tool hints. We further show that supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards derived from KaliBench significantly improve an 8B model and achieve performance comparable to a 685B MoE model.