Track new results across pure and applied mathematics.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a quantum sparse autoencoder (QSAE) for estimating Q-matrices in cognitive diagnosis, marking the first use of quantum machine learning in this domain. The QSAE effectively embeds student response patterns into a quantum circuit, yielding a sparse latent representation that is mapped to the Q-matrix, demonstrating superior stability and robustness compared to classical autoencoders. Benchmarking against a classical autoencoder across simulated and real-world datasets, the QSAE shows lower variance and outperforms the CAE in several instances, highlighting its potential to navigate complex latent structures in educational data mining.
Quantum machine learning enhances Q-matrix estimation by providing greater stability and robustness, even when classical methods achieve higher average accuracy.
Q-matrices play a central role in cognitive diagnosis within educational data mining (EDM), specifying which latent skills each assessment item requires. Data-driven Q-matrix estimation remains challenging when assessments involve many correlated skills and when real response patterns depart from idealized generative assumptions. We introduce a novel quantum sparse autoencoder (QSAE) for Q-matrix estimation, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first application of quantum machine learning (QML) to cognitive diagnosis. Overall, the QSAE embeds each student's binary response vector into a quantum circuit using an encoder, compresses it into a sparse latent representation, and maps that representation to the Q-matrix. We benchmark the QSAE against a classical autoencoder (CAE) across 60 simulated datasets and 9 real-world assessment datasets. The results reveal complementary strengths. Although the CAE partially achieves higher average accuracy under several simulation conditions, the QSAE is substantially more stable across replications, exhibiting lower variance in 49 of the 60 conditions. Moreover, on real assessment data, the QSAE outperforms the CAE on 6 of the 9 datasets. These findings suggest that the principal advancement of QML in this setting is not universal accuracy improvement, but enhanced robustness and capability to explore latent-structure complexity in real datasets.