Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates six advanced deep learning weather emulators against traditional forecasting methods to assess their effectiveness in predicting global near-surface temperatures and extreme heat events at lead times of 10-15 days. The findings reveal that while some emulators achieve comparable or superior deterministic temperature skill to physics-based models, they often sacrifice spectral fidelity, leading to underrepresentation of peak heat intensities. This underscores the promise of AI in improving long-range temperature forecasts, while also highlighting the challenges in providing reliable early warnings for extreme heat in a warming climate.
Some AI weather emulators outperform traditional models in predicting extreme heat, but at the cost of critical detail in peak intensity.
Atmospheric predictability declines rapidly beyond the next ten days, such that forecasts at longer lead times primarily convey large-scale trends rather than specific states. Yet in a warming world, improving early warnings of extreme heat is an increasingly critical challenge. Here we evaluate six state-of-the-art deep learning weather emulators - Pangu-Weather, FuXi, ArchesWeather, AIFS, GraphCast and Aurora - alongside leading dynamical systems and statistical baselines in forecasting global near-surface temperature and extreme heat at lead times of 10-15 days. We find that several emulators rival or even surpass physics-based forecasts in deterministic temperature skill, but do so at the cost of reduced spectral fidelity, in a process widely known as blurring. While all models show some degree of predictive skill for extreme heat, most emulators under-represent peak intensities, and IFS recall is greater than that of any of the emulators. These results highlight both the emerging potential of AI to enhance extended range temperature prediction, and the remaining challenges in delivering reliable, actionable early warnings in a changing climate.