Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a physics-anchored residual quantum neural network (QNN) approach for cloud-cover parameterization, learning corrections to existing physical model outputs rather than direct predictions. This residual formulation significantly reduces physical-space mean squared error compared to direct QNN prediction, achieving up to a 54.3% improvement across various circuit configurations. While residual QNNs outperform compact classical counterparts, stronger classical references like Grundner-Q1 still set a performance boundary.
Learning a residual correction to a physics-informed estimate dramatically boosts QNN performance in cloud-cover parameterization, outperforming both direct QNNs and compact MLPs.
Compact quantum neural networks have been explored for cloud-cover parameterization, but their predictive value depends on how physical knowledge is incorporated and which classical models provide the reference. We investigate an offline residual formulation that retains a fitted \XR\ cloud-cover estimate and learns a correction to its logit in transformed target space. Using released ICON/DYAMOND-derived data, we compare ten model variants in six- and eight-input settings, with three matched replicates and 10,000 training samples per replicate. All quantum circuits use local Z readout and noiseless exact expectation values. Under a common 30-epoch protocol, residual prediction reduced physical-space test mean squared error relative to direct QNN prediction by 54.3\% and 38.8\% for six-input XYZ and ZZXY circuits, and by 49.2\% and 38.9\% for their eight-input versions. Residual QNNs also outperformed the selected compact residual multilayer perceptron in every paired replicate. A larger, longer-trained Grundner-Q1 adaptation nevertheless achieved lower error: residual Q1 reached mean MSEs of 0.00778 and 0.00791, compared with 0.01124 and 0.01082 for residual XYZ. The results support residual prediction for compact simulated QNNs within the tested budget and establish a clear boundary set by stronger classical references. They do not establish computational quantum advantage or online climate-model skill.