Track synthesis, materials and catalysis as it is published.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Q-MALDetect, a hybrid quantum-classical convolutional and variational-quantum detector for x86-64 ELF binaries represented as byte images, to analyze adversarial robustness in quantum malware detection. Despite achieving high training accuracy (97.2%), Q-MALDetect exhibits significant robustness degradation under feature-space and Grad-CAM-guided executable-aware evasion attacks, with the strongest feature-space attack reaching a 78.7% attack success rate. Dynamic adversarial training proves to be the most effective defense, substantially reducing attack success rates across various attack types, while convolutional-autoencoder preprocessing surprisingly exacerbates executable-aware attacks.
Quantum malware detectors, while accurate on clean data, are surprisingly vulnerable to sophisticated executable-aware adversarial attacks, with defenses like dynamic adversarial training showing promise.
Quantum machine-learning (QML) models are increasingly considered for security applications, yet their adversarial robustness in malware analysis remains insufficiently understood. This paper presents Q-MALDetect, a hybrid convolutional and variational-quantum detector for byte-image representations of x86-64 Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) binaries, and evaluates it under feature-space and a range of Grad-CAM-guided, executable-aware evasion attacks. The model achieves 97.2% training accuracy, but its robustness deteriorates as attack strength increases, with the strongest evaluated feature-space attack reaching a 78.7% attack success rate (ASR). Among executable-aware attacks, Grad-CAM-guided no-operation (NOP) insertion produces the highest conditional ASR of 32.9%. Dynamic adversarial training is the most effective evaluated defense, reducing feature-space ASR to as low as 5.0%, executable-aware ASR to 7.7%, and the sequential-attack ASR to 34.0%. In contrast, convolutional-autoencoder preprocessing increases executable-aware ASR to 39.7%, coinciding with a rise in Grad-CAM attribution mass within the mutable .text region from 35.2% to 45.7%. Ablation results reveal no monotonic relationship between qubit count and robustness, while the encoding interface modifies the learned attack surface without neutralizing the strongest attack. These findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of attacks and defenses depends strongly on the perturbation constraints and evaluation conditions. Reliable deployment of QML malware detectors therefore requires assessment against both feature-space and executable-aware attacks rather than reliance on clean accuracy or generic denoising alone.