Track synthesis, materials and catalysis as it is published.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This Perspective argues that machine learning potentials (MLPs) can surpass the accuracy of their underlying quantum chemistry training methods by generalizing across the space of computational methods themselves, not just configurations or compounds. Working implementations in DFT and wavefunction theories demonstrate MLPs achieving higher accuracy than any individual training method, even when not refitted to experimental data. This approach promises to redefine training dataset construction and model evaluation, ultimately pushing the accuracy limits of chemical simulations.
MLPs can achieve higher accuracy than their training quantum chemistry methods by learning to generalize across computational approaches, not just chemical spaces.
Although machine learning potentials (MLPs) generalize across configurational and chemical compound spaces, their accuracy is commonly believed to be limited by their training methods, with improvements beyond this limit achieved so far only by refitting to experimental observables. In this Perspective, we argue that MLPs can also be made more accurate than their training methods non-empirically by generalizing across a third space, that of quantum-chemical methods. We propose routes to method-transferable MLPs that predict at unseen methods, with working implementations in both density-functional and wavefunction-based theories showing that they can be more accurate than any of their training methods. Aiming beyond the accuracy of the training methods could also make universal MLPs more accurate than single-method models, even when the method-transferable MLPs remain less accurate than those QM methods. Method-transferable MLPs will shape the construction of training datasets and the evaluation of models, pushing the accuracy limits of chemical simulations.