Track synthesis, materials and catalysis as it is published.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Researchers implemented a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework to solve the depth-averaged Savage-Hutter equations for granular avalanche dynamics across 1D analytical and 2D experimental regimes. Modeling these dynamics via pure PDE residuals in 2D causes the network to collapse to a trivial zero solution, exposing a critical optimization failure mode in standard physics-informed formulations. By anchoring the conservation loss with just ten sparse deposit measurements, the hybrid framework accurately tracks unsteady granular collapse, matching laboratory benchmarks with 2.7–6.7 mm height RMSE and 69–81% wetted-area IoU.
Just ten sparse observational points are sufficient to prevent PINNs from collapsing into trivial zero solutions when simulating complex 2D granular avalanches.
Accurate prediction of avalanche motion is essential for hazard assessment in mountainous terrain. This study develops and evaluates a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework for the Savage-Hutter model of depth-averaged granular flow, progressing from 1D analytical verification to 2D experimental validation. First, three 1D problems of increasing complexity were verified against the analytical solution: height prediction with prescribed velocity, velocity prediction with prescribed height, and coupled prediction of both fields using the conservative formulation. The decoupled tests accurately reconstructed the spatio-temporal evolution of each field when the other was prescribed. The coupled formulation learned both fields without prescribed data, achieving mean height and velocity RMSEs of 0.043 and 0.079 in non-dimensional units. A hyperparameter sensitivity study evaluated the effects of network depth, width, collocation density, learning rate, and epochs. The framework was then extended to 2D and validated against laboratory experiments of a cylindrical granular pile collapsing on an inclined plane, with TITAN2D providing numerical comparisons. Purely physics-based training converged to the trivial zero solution; augmenting the loss with 10 sparse training points from final deposit profiles produced a physics-informed, data-assisted hybrid framework. Peak flow depth, depth-averaged velocity, RMSE, and wetted-area IoU evaluated global and local agreement. Global height RMSE ranged from 2.7 to 6.7 mm across four experimental cases, while mean wetted-area IoU ranged from 69 to 81 %, demonstrating consistent performance across variations in pile mass and slope angle.