Track synthesis, materials and catalysis as it is published.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the MADRS pipeline, an advanced LLM-based tool designed to enhance depression assessment in clinical trials by converting audio interviews into structured transcripts and mapping them to the MADRS symptom items. The system not only estimates symptom severity but also identifies discrepancies in clinical ratings, thus providing valuable insights for clinicians. Evaluated against expert ratings, the pipeline achieved a strong correlation of 0.867, underscoring its potential to improve clinical assessment accuracy and reliability.
Clinicians can now leverage a powerful LLM pipeline that correlates 86.7% with expert ratings to enhance depression assessments in clinical trials.
Depression is a major mental disorder for which diagnosis relies primarily on clinical assessments. Automated methods to support its detection via the psychiatric MADRS scale are getting more and more attention. While existing solutions primarily focus on detecting the disorder from different text sources (e.g., online text, social media), there is still limited support for clinical trials, where clinical assessments are conducted through structured interviews based on standard guidelines such as SIGMA. In this work, we develop a LLM pipeline specifically designed to support clinicians in supporting the assessment of depression in patients enrolled in clinical trials. Our pipeline converts audio interviews into transcripts, maps them into the ten MADRS symptom items, estimates their severity, and identify problematic clinical ratings associated with them. Evaluation on real clinical interviews shows a strong overall correlation of 0.867 with expert ratings, providing interpretable support for future assessments in clinical trials.