Track synthesis, materials and catalysis as it is published.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates whether induced emotions can influence the decision-making processes of Large Language Models (LLMs) in sequential tasks, specifically using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). While LLMs can recognize and respond to emotional cues, the research reveals that induced emotions do not broadly bias LLM decision dynamics as they do in humans; however, anger specifically reduces sensitivity to penalties and exploration in early decision-making stages. These findings highlight critical differences in how LLMs and humans process emotional influences, paving the way for future exploration of affective modulation in AI agents.
Induced anger can lock LLMs into poor decision patterns by reducing their sensitivity to penalties, unlike human decision-making.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in high-stakes domains, understanding contextual factors that may modulate their decision-making becomes critical. While LLMs are trained to perceive and resonate with users'emotions, it remains unclear whether induced emotion can influence their sequential decision-making. We investigate this question using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a classic psychological paradigm for studying decision-making under uncertainty, combined with an imagination-based emotion induction procedure. We first validate the feasibility of this paradigm by confirming that LLMs can sense strong, distinguishable emotions from context and that LLM agents can learn from sequential interactions in a human-like pace. With the validated setup, we find that, different from humans, induced emotion does not significantly bias the decision dynamics of LLM agents on average. However, the effects of anger are conditioned: inducing anger makes LLM agents less sensitive to penalties for bad decisions, and in early stages of the game, anger can lower exploration, locking decisions into a few choices early. These findings reveal the subtle yet distinct effects of induced emotion on LLM decision-making compared to human behavior, and provide a tool for future research on affective modulation of LLM agents.
NUS