Track synthesis, materials and catalysis as it is published.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the inverse problem of inferring alloy composition and processing parameters from microstructural and textural data. By comparing conventional statistical descriptors, vision embeddings, and graph neural networks on a dataset of magnesium alloys, the study demonstrates that traditional methods outperform learned embeddings in predicting alloy composition. While process parameters are recoverable, the inclusion of microstructural information significantly reduces prediction error compared to using composition alone.
Conventional microstructure and texture statistics accurately predict alloy composition from micrographs, outperforming learned embeddings by a significant margin.
The mechanical properties of a metallic alloy are set by its microstructure and texture: the size and shape of its grains and the orientation of their crystals. That structure is in turn set by a recipe, the alloy composition together with the processing parameters. Alloy development runs this chain forwards, tuning the structure until a target property is met. Running it backwards, from an optimized structure to the recipe that would produce it, still relies on expert knowledge. We ask whether this backwards step can be learned. On an in-house dataset of 107 magnesium alloy extrusion conditions across 14 alloys, each with optical micrographs and an X-ray texture measurement, we compare three descriptors of microstructure and texture: conventional grain and texture statistics, a vision embedding from a pretrained image encoder, and a graph neural network on the grain network. Each is paired with prediction heads for two tasks: the alloy composition given the process (Task A), and the process parameters given the composition (Task B). Under 5-fold cross-validation, the conventional descriptors identify the correct alloy for 65% of held-out conditions, against 17% for always guessing the most common alloy, while the learned embeddings stay below 30%. The process parameters are recoverable but noisier: compared with using the composition alone, the microstructure roughly halves the temperature error. Because only a few alloys were cast and only a few press settings were used, both answers are discrete, and heads that pick from these known options, while respecting their order, worked better than heads that predict a free value.