Track genomics, neuroscience and molecular biology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Attachment Regulation and Control (ARC) framework, a dynamic feedback-regulation model that explicates the temporal processes underlying adult romantic attachment beyond static anxiety and avoidance dimensions. ARC models how individuals perceive relational states, compare them to desired states, initiate regulatory actions, and update their internal models based on partner feedback. The framework offers empirically testable hypotheses by operationalizing discrepancy scores and exploring moderating influences of attachment styles and secure-base representations.
Adult attachment is not just about anxiety and avoidance, but a continuous feedback loop of perception, action, and learning driven by relational discrepancies.
Adult attachment is commonly represented by attachment anxiety and avoidance, but these person-level dimensions do not by themselves specify how momentary relational conditions are perceived, compared with desired conditions, translated into action, and updated after interpersonal feedback. We present the Attachment Regulation and Control (ARC) framework as an integrative feedback-regulation account that makes these temporal assumptions explicit and empirically testable. In ARC, control refers to feedback-based regulation toward relational goals in the control-theoretic sense, not interpersonal dominance, coercion, or a generalized need for control. ARC does not claim a novel control-system architecture. Instead, it synthesizes established control-theoretic attachment ideas, secure-base representations, perceived partner responsiveness, relational discrepancy, dyadic regulation, and recovery into a parsimonious sequence for adult romantic relationships: perceived relational state, desired relational state, discrepancy, regulatory action, partner feedback, state updating, and recovery. The framework treats the discrepancy score itself as a falsifiable modeling restriction by comparing it with perceived-state-only, unconstrained perceived-plus-desired-state, and asymmetric discrepancy alternatives. Attachment anxiety and avoidance form core regulation moderators. Secure-base representation is a candidate requiring incremental prediction of recovery outcomes. Mentalized affectivity and regulation flexibility remain optional moderators, while adult disorganization is an independent extension outcome.