Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a location-invariant estimator for quantile treatment effects (QTEs) that addresses the limitations of existing methods in heavy-tailed distributions, which are sensitive to location shifts. By adapting the Fraga estimator of the extreme value index (EVI) using inverse propensity score weighting and implementing a difference-based extrapolation scheme, the authors ensure that the estimator remains invariant under location shifts. The proposed method demonstrates consistency and asymptotic normality, validated through simulations that confirm its robustness and accurate inference capabilities.
Location-invariant QTE estimators can now provide reliable insights into treatment effects even in heavy-tailed distributions, overcoming a significant limitation of previous methods.
Quantile treatment effects (QTEs) measure the effect of a treatment on the distribution of an outcome, and their estimation at extreme quantile levels is of central interest in applications where the target quantiles lie far beyond the range of the data. For heavy-tailed potential outcomes, existing extremal QTE estimators rely on extrapolation combined with a causal extreme value index (EVI) estimator, but the resulting estimator is not invariant under a common location shift of the potential outcome distributions, even though the population QTE is. We address this issue in two steps. First, we adapt the location-invariant Fraga estimator of the EVI to the causal setting using inverse propensity score weighting. Second, we replace the original extrapolation formula with a difference-based scheme, under which the location parameter cancels when quantile differences are taken. The resulting QTE estimator is therefore location invariant. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed extremal QTE estimators, and provide a consistent variance estimator, leading to asymptotically valid inference. A simulation study confirms the location invariance, the stability with respect to the threshold, and the coverage of the proposed methods.