Track genomics, neuroscience and molecular biology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the ability of vision-language models (VLMs) to capture temporal structure by framing temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem. Using a novel benchmark called TimeCatch, the authors create temporal anomalies through frame swapping and Gaussian noise, revealing that while VLMs excel at detecting frame-level anomalies, they perform poorly on temporal anomaly detection and localization. The findings highlight a significant gap in VLMs' capabilities, indicating they struggle to integrate information across frames, a crucial aspect for understanding temporal consistency in visual data.
VLMs can pinpoint frame-level anomalies but falter at detecting temporal inconsistencies, revealing a critical limitation in their reasoning capabilities.
Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on video and image-sequence benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they capture temporal structure. To study this question, we formulate temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem, providing a simple and controlled evaluation that directly tests sensitivity to temporal consistency. We introduce TimeCatch, where temporal anomalies are created by swapping consecutive frames and frame-level anomalies by replacing a frame with Gaussian noise. Models are evaluated on anomaly detection and localization tasks across four synthetic and real-world datasets, alongside a human study. Our evaluation reveals a substantial gap between frame-level and temporal anomaly detection. While VLMs consistently detect frame-level anomalies and often localize them accurately, they perform near chance on temporal anomaly detection and only modestly above chance on localization. Humans, in contrast, achieve near-ceiling performance on both tasks. Additional analyses across model scales, prompting strategies, sequence lengths, and visual similarity suggest that these failures cannot be explained solely by limitations in perception or model capacity. Together, these findings indicate that current VLMs can identify anomalies within individual frames but struggle to integrate information across frames to reason about temporal consistency. TimeCatch provides a controlled benchmark for evaluating temporal grounding in vision-language models.