Track genomics, neuroscience and molecular biology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a nonstationary Gaussian Process kernel surrogate for tendon-driven continuum robots, learning a design-dependent metric to predict full equilibrium configurations and their uncertainty. By representing backbone position and rotational strain with spatial kernels and reconstructing orientation on SO(3), the method preserves physical constraints and enables efficient, uncertainty-aware design space exploration. Experiments demonstrate a 15% reduction in mean trajectory error via kernel-coverage acquisition and superior accuracy and data efficiency over prior neural operator models, with uncertainty increasing for unsupported designs.
Continuum robot design can now be optimized with 5x less data and 30-50% higher accuracy, while also quantifying prediction uncertainty.
We develop an uncertainty-aware, operator-learning-based surrogate for tendon-driven continuum robots (TDCRs) that generalizes across robot design and actuation while predicting the complete equilibrium configuration. Our central idea is a nonstationary Gaussian-process (GP) kernel whose metric is learned by a shallow neural network from mechanics-aware design coordinates. The network learns how similarity changes across design space, while the resulting kernel defines the design-to-pose operator, its posterior uncertainty, and a criterion for sequential simulator acquisition. We represent backbone position and rotational strain with spatial kernels and reconstruct orientation directly on SO(3), preserving valid material frames and tendon geometry. We use ASkotch with Nystrom preconditioning for scalable kernel operator solves and a separate Nystrom approximation for posterior covariance. Experiments show that kernel-coverage acquisition reduces mean trajectory error by approximately 15% relative to IID sampling, while posterior variance increases for increasingly unsupported designs. Compared with prior neural-operator TDCR models, the method is 30-50% more accurate using approximately 5x fewer training designs while additionally providing posterior uncertainty estimates.