Track genomics, neuroscience and molecular biology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study quantifies the impact of scan time and subject diversity on EEG decoding performance across five deep learning architectures and four datasets. By fitting power-law relationships to performance metrics as a function of training data volume (controlled by subject and trial counts), the research demonstrates that the distinction between trial and subject scaling diminishes with increasing data. The findings reveal model and dataset-specific scaling laws that enable robust performance prediction and data-efficient experimental design, with extrapolations suggesting RMSEs below 0.1 for larger subject pools.
EEG decoding performance scales predictably with data, but the optimal balance between subject diversity and scan time depends heavily on the model and dataset.
Deep learning has become a cornerstone of EEG-based brain decoding, with a growing number of architectures proposed every day. However, how the performance of these different models scales with data volume is not clear. Although this relationship has been characterized in other fields under the name of scaling laws, it remains poorly understood in the EEG domain. The present study addresses this gap by investigating how scan time and subject diversity affect the performance of different architectures. We evaluated five models across four EEG datasets. Training data volume was controlled by varying both subject count and trial volume under cross-subject validation. We then fitted power-law relationships to characterize the resulting behavior. Our findings reveal that as total data volume increases, the distinction between trial and subject scaling becomes largely irrelevant. Furthermore, we show that power-law relationships are both model and dataset-specific, yet they provide a robust descriptive framework for EEG decoding performance. Extrapolation to larger subject pools yields RMSE values below 0.1 in most cases. Our work contributes to the literature by providing a descriptive framework for data scaling in EEG and by demonstrating data-efficient experimental design in EEG research.