Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Inspect India Evals, an open-source benchmarking framework designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) specifically within the diverse linguistic and cultural context of India. By addressing the limitations of existing benchmarks that are predominantly English- and Western-centric, the framework includes six tailored evaluations, such as multilingual MMLU and safety assessments for Digital Public Infrastructure. The results reveal that the Sarvam-M 24B and Gemma 2 27B models excelled, achieving an 80% score on the India Fairness Index, with Sarvam-M outperforming larger models in cultural knowledge and safety compliance.
LLMs trained on Western benchmarks may overlook critical safety and fairness issues unique to India, but the Inspect India Evals framework reveals significant performance disparities among models in this context.
India is a vast nation of over 1.4 billion people, varied by hundreds of diverse and locally specific traditions and cultures and 22 officially recognized languages. Large language models (LLMs) are now being deployed on a massive scale throughout the mainland as well as in remote villages. However, the common benchmarks - MMLU, BIG-Bench, and TruthfulQA are almost exclusively English- and Western-centric. They do not identify those safety, fairness, and accuracy failures unique to the Indian context. That is the gap Inspect India Evals seeks to fill. It is an open-source framework built on top of UK AISI's Inspect AI platform. It has six benchmarks: Multilingual MMLU across sixteen Indian languages, BharatBBQ (our adaptation of BBQ for Indian social bias), a safety evaluation for Digital Public Infrastructure, a multilingual safety test using harmful prompts in Indian languages, a multi-turn jailbreak resistance test, and an Indian cultural knowledge benchmark scored using LLM-as-judge rubrics. In this study, we tested five open-weight models ranging from 8B to 32B parameters. Sarvam-M 24B and Gemma 2 27B came out on top, both scoring 80% on the composite India Fairness Index, with Sarvam-M even beating larger 32B models on Indian cultural knowledge and DPI safety compliance. All models scored 100% refusal on Multilingual Safety, whereas DPI safety varied from 20% to 100%. The framework is public. It's built to work with the UK AISI registry. Anyone can reproduce or extend this work.