Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes a corpus of 126,602 news articles to characterize the temporal dynamics of news coverage for violent and catastrophic events. It quantifies narrative change using metrics like publication volume, semantic drift, semantic dispersion, and term relevance. The study finds structured news-cycle patterns for sudden impact events, including rapid coverage surges, early semantic drift, and gradual declines.
Catastrophic news events follow predictable cycles of coverage, semantic drift, and decline, revealing underlying patterns in public discourse during crises.
The modern news cycle has been fundamentally reshaped by the rapid exchange of information online. As a result, media framing shifts dynamically as new information, political responses, and social reactions emerge. Understanding how these narratives form, propagate, and evolve is essential for interpreting public discourse during moments of crisis. In this study, we examine the temporal and semantic dynamics of reporting for violent and catastrophic events using a large-scale corpus of 126,602 news articles collected from online publishers. We quantify narrative change through publication volume, semantic drift, semantic dispersion, and term relevance. Our results show that sudden events of impact exhibit structured and predictable news-cycle patterns characterized by rapid surges in coverage, early semantic drift, and gradual declines toward the baseline. In addition, our results indicate the terms that are driving the temporal patterns.