Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the layer-wise distribution of EEG-decodable linguistic information within a Llama-3.1-8B model during silent reading, contrasting word-level decodability with a context-tracking component. Word identity information is found to be concentrated in earlier LLM layers, while passage-level context tracking emerges and strengthens in deeper layers, even from single EEG windows. This reveals a functional specialization across LLM depth, where early layers encode local word representations and later layers capture broader discourse state.
Passage-level context is decodable from single EEG windows, with this information residing in deeper LLM layers, suggesting a richer representation of discourse than previously assumed.
In a previous report we showed that a decoder can recover open-vocabulary word-level information from 19-channel EEG recorded during silent reading, by aligning short EEG windows with hidden-state embeddings of the presented word taken from a large language model (LLM). That analysis contrasted two of the model's 33 layers: the context-free input embedding and one mid-depth layer. Here we ask how EEG-decodable structure is distributed over the full depth of the language model. We trained one decoder per layer of Llama-3.1-8B, with and without a causal transformer over the sequence of EEG windows. We distinguish word-level decodability from a context-tracking component. Word-level decodability peaks in early layers and declines steadily towards the last layer. In contrast, the context-tracking component of the retrieval gain rises with depth, both with and without a causal transformer. Unexpectedly, a decoder that sees a single 0.5-s window at a time tracks the text passage too. Two new controls dissect this component. A target-geometry control, a synthetic predictor made of the true target plus noise calibrated to each decoder's word-level accuracy, shows that context tracking is not a by-product of word decoding and target geometry. A control that permutes predictions across runs from either the same or from different sessions shows that most of the observed context-tracking is not caused by an EEG recording session signature. Instead, context tracking mostly follows the text. A single EEG window therefore carries passage-level information that a contextual target can absorb. The results locate word identity in the early layers of the language model, discourse state in the deeper layers, and make the choice of target layer a design dial for EEG language decoders.