Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
We benchmark classical and learning-based motion planning methods against dynamic, time-varying hazards in a unified environment, revealing a critical regime shift based on obstacle uncertainty. Classical planners excel in deterministic settings but falter under stochastic dynamics, where PPO-trained policies achieve superior latency, success, and path quality. The study highlights that uncertainty in obstacle evolution, rather than partial observability, is the primary determinant of practical planning paradigm effectiveness.
Uncertainty in dynamic obstacle evolution, not partial observability, dictates whether classical or learning-based motion planning prevails.
We study real-time motion planning in dynamic hazard fields through a controlled comparison between classical planning and learning-based methods. Rather than introducing a new planner, we construct a unified benchmark in which representative classical and learning-based methods face the same environments, motion constraints, information assumptions, and evaluation metrics. The test environment consists of planar domains populated with rotating sprinkler-like hazards that generate time-varying forbidden regions via sweeping angular sectors. Our results show a clear regime shift. In deterministic environments, classical planners achieve near-perfect success and higher-quality paths, though sometimes at the cost of substantial planning or replanning time. Under stochastic obstacle dynamics, however, online search becomes strongly budget-sensitive: low budgets lead to frequent failure, while high budgets improve success at the cost of latency and longer trajectories. PPO-based policies, trained under the same scenario distribution, consistently outperform in latency, success rate, and path quality in these stochastic regimes. Overall, the results indicate that uncertainty in obstacle evolution, more than partial observability, is the dominant factor determining which planning paradigm is practically effective for the problem at hand.