Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper tackles distribution network reconfiguration under demand uncertainty by employing a two-stage stochastic formulation where network topology is decided upfront and electrical variables are optimized per scenario. The problem is cast as a Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Program (MISOCP) incorporating power balance, losses, voltage limits, and radiality constraints. Experiments on diverse networks demonstrate significant expected loss reductions (average 31.76%) and voltage violation mitigation (approx. 55%), though the stochastic benefit was limited by the homothetic scenario structure.
Spatially uniform demand uncertainty offers little advantage for distribution network reconfiguration, highlighting the critical need for heterogeneous scenarios to drive meaningful topological decisions.
This paper investigates distribution network reconfiguration under demand uncertainty using a two-stage stochastic formulation. The network topology is selected in the first stage, whereas the electrical variables are determined separately for each scenario. The deterministic equivalent is formulated as a MISOCP problem that accounts for power balances, losses, voltage constraints, and radiality. Experiments on 12 networks, ranging from 17 to 10,561 nodes, consider three demand scenarios. Reconfiguration reduced expected losses in all instances, with reductions ranging from 3.23% to 65.23% and averaging 31.76%, while also reducing the number of voltage violations in the ex post evaluation by approximately 55%. Eleven of the 12 problems were solved to optimality within the prescribed time limit. However, the additional benefit of stochastic modeling was negligible because of the homothetic structure of the scenarios considered, which preserves the spatial distribution of loads. The results show that spatially heterogeneous scenarios are important for the representation of uncertainty to meaningfully affect reconfiguration decisions.