Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models exhibit significant instruction phrasing sensitivity, unlike their vision-language counterparts, leading to substantial performance drops with minor edits. Through systematic analysis and an oracle phrase search, this paper quantifies this sensitivity, demonstrating that phrasing alone accounts for a large portion of the in-distribution/out-of-distribution performance gap. A novel, retraining-free mitigation strategy leverages a large language model to distill rephrasing rules, which are then applied at deployment to rewrite instructions, significantly improving VLA performance, especially on out-of-distribution tasks.
A single-word instruction change can tank VLA performance by 98%, but a simple LLM-based rephrasing pipeline boosts success by up to 27% without retraining.
Vision-language-action models (VLAs) are strikingly sensitive to instruction phrasing and do not inherit the language robustness of the vision-language models they are built on. A one-word edit can move success by tens of points: $π_{0.5}$ turns on a LIBERO stove 100% of the time for "switch on the stove" and 2% for "switch on the hot plate", and a $π_0$ checkpoint finetuned with rephrase augmentation still shows swings of up to 61 points. We characterize this sensitivity with statistically tested single-edit swings and an oracle phrase search, which shows that phrasing alone nearly closes the 21-point gap between in-distribution and out-of-distribution tasks. We then reduce it without modifying the policy. Because the sensitivity is systematic, it can be expressed as explicit rules: we score many phrasings of a few training tasks, have a large language model distill the evidence into ten to twenty rephrasing rules, and at deployment rewrite each incoming instruction once under these rules. The rules improve the frozen $π_0$ by 16 to 27% relative on twelve held-out tasks across adversarial, VLM-generated, and human-generated phrasings, with gains concentrated on out-of-distribution tasks. The pipeline replicates on $π_{0.5}$ and LIBERO, lifting in-finetune success from 93.6% to 97.8%. The method requires no retraining and no per-step verification, and applies zero-shot to unseen tasks and instructions. Project website: https://sttawm.github.io/rephrase-before-you-act