Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RunningTab, a novel framework for LLM agents performing Direct Workspace Interaction (DWI) by augmenting it with an environment-side "tab" to track task requirements and progress. RunningTab addresses the critical issue of LLMs forgetting what has been read and what remains to be done within a task, which is a significant limitation of plain DWI. Experiments across three benchmarks and three LLMs demonstrate that RunningTab consistently outperforms plain DWI and model-internal tracking methods, ensuring that deliverables accurately reflect the task's requirements.
LLM agents can now reliably track and fulfill complex deliverable requirements across numerous files without losing context, thanks to an environment-side "tab" that acts as a persistent, shared task ledger.
Much knowledge work produces new deliverables from files a workspace already holds, and LLM agents are beginning to take such work over. Through direct corpus interaction, an agent can search and read any of those files from a terminal with no indexing, and producing a deliverable from many of them in this way is what we call direct workspace interaction (DWI). Reaching the files, however, is only half the task: nothing keeps track of what the task asks for, what has been read, and what was listed but never opened, all of which slip through the context window without leaving a trace, so an agent may extract a figure and still deliver a report without it. To address this, we present RunningTab, a framework that equips direct workspace interaction with an environment-side tab: a per-task record of what the task still owes, kept by the environment alongside the agent. Specifically, the agent adds its requirements, while the environment records every file read as an excerpt with its provenance and every listed but unopened file as a candidate; the agent can then see each requirement beside its best-matching excerpts and top unopened candidates, resolve it against matching content or set it aside with a reason, and, should it try to finish with requirements still open, receive them in a finish check. We validate RunningTab on three benchmarks with three LLMs, where it consistently outperforms plain DWI and baselines that keep the record in the model, while its tab usually holds the values a deliverable needs once seen.