Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the sample complexity of approximate cloning for structured quantum states, moving beyond the prohibitively high costs for general states. By analyzing fermionic Gaussian, bosonic Gaussian, and qudit phase states, the authors demonstrate significant reductions in cloning complexity, from exponential to polynomial in system size for fermions and bosons. These findings are enabled by a unified representation-theoretic framework and provide practical insights into quantum state replication for complex systems.
Quantum cloning of structured states like fermionic and bosonic Gaussian states can be achieved with polynomial sample complexity, a dramatic improvement over general states.
The no-cloning theorem is a cornerstone result in quantum mechanics that forbids copying of general quantum information. More quantitatively, even given $N$ copies of an unknown state, any channel producing an $(N+1)$-copy state incurs a nonzero trace-distance error on some inputs. Turning this around, one can ask about the sample complexity of approximate $N\rightarrow N+1$ cloning: for a desired small error $ε$, what $N$ suffices? For arbitrary pure states on a Hilbert space $H$, the answer is $N\simeq \dim H/ε$ - astronomically large for most $H$ of interest. What if the input is promised to lie in a structured family? We examine a range of families fundamental to many-body physics and quantum information: $n$-mode fermionic Gaussian and Slater states, $n$-mode bosonic Gaussian states, and qudit phase states. For fermions, we construct optimal cloning channels, reducing the complexity from exponential to polynomial in $n$. For bosonic Gaussian states, we construct an explicit cloner that certifies polynomial complexity, without any constraint on the energy of the state; this channel, however, is not optimal in general. The fermionic and bosonic results follow from a single representation-theoretic framework, which generalizes previous work by Werner and by Chiribella and Yang; it also yields the cloners' unitary implementation. Furthermore, we explain why for many families the cloning complexity is linear in the dimension of the family manifold, via a controlled saddle-point evaluation of the frame potential at high $N$. The same calculation accounts for the analogous scaling of tomography complexity. The above framework does not cover phase states; for these we give an independent construction of a channel with optimal cloning fidelity. Our work complements recent results on cloning stabilizer states.