Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper argues that data filtering in clinical ML is a critical scientific decision, not mere preprocessing, as it fundamentally alters the task's complexity and statistical properties. The authors highlight that current practices often obscure these choices, hindering reproducibility and understanding of model performance. They advocate for transparent and explainable filtering pipelines to ensure the integrity of clinical ML research.
Clinical ML models are only as good as their filtered data, yet current practices obscure crucial scientific decisions that shape task complexity and performance.
Machine learning (ML) studies using clinical data often rely on preprocessing and filtering pipelines before model development. The filtering decisions made in these pipelines can alter the dataset's statistical structure and may artificially reduce or increase the complexity of the prediction task. We argue that filtering choices should be treated as part of the scientific method rather than as a routine preprocessing step. We further discuss the need for explainable and transparent preprocessing pipelines that allow researchers to understand why specific filtering choices are made and how these choices affect the resulting data distribution and model performance. All of the source code for this work is available on GitHub.