Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces EMG-FM-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the transfer and adaptation capabilities of foundation models (FMs) on electromyography (EMG) data, addressing the critical gap in understanding FM performance on diverse physiological signals. The benchmark, comprising 20 public datasets and over 1 million EMG segments, systematically assesses nine pretrained FMs across four key research questions concerning frozen vs. fine-tuned performance, pretraining benefits over scratch training, generalization to new users with limited data, and task-specific performance. Results reveal that while linear probing offers insights, full fine-tuning significantly alters downstream EMG performance, pretraining benefits are model-dependent and not universal, and few-shot adaptation partially recovers performance on new users but does not fully bridge the gap.
Pretrained time-series foundation models offer surprisingly inconsistent benefits for EMG tasks, with full fine-tuning often outperforming linear probing and few-shot adaptation only partially recovering performance on new users.
Foundation models (FMs) are increasingly being developed for general time series and physiological signals, yet their transferability to downstream physiological tasks remains poorly understood. This question is particularly challenging for electromyography (EMG), where signal distributions vary substantially across users, sensing configurations, acquisition hardware, and downstream tasks. We introduce EMG-FM-Bench, a systematic benchmark for studying foundation-model transfer and adaptation on EMG. EMG-FM-Bench unifies 20 public datasets with over 1 million EMG segments and evaluates nine pretrained foundation models across four questions: how pretrained models perform when frozen or fully fine-tuned, how much pretraining helps compared with training the same model from scratch, how well models generalize to new users with limited labeled data, and how performance changes across different EMG tasks. Across the benchmark, linear probing provides useful information about pretrained representations, but full fine-tuning can substantially change downstream EMG performance. Comparing each pretrained model with the same model trained from scratch shows that the benefit of pretraining varies substantially across models and is not universal. Performance decreases when models are evaluated on new users, while five-shot adaptation improves macro-F1 in 70.2% of evaluated model-dataset combinations but recovers only part of the lost performance. Model performance is highly consistent between upper- and lower-limb classification and remains strongly correlated with continuous EMG-to-text decoding. Together, these results provide a systematic view of when pretrained time-series models transfer effectively to EMG and how their performance depends on fine-tuning, user variation, and downstream task.