Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the efficacy of Time-series Foundation Models (TSFMs) for predictive control by analyzing their ability to capture system responses to control interventions, using residential heat-pump control as a testbed. The key finding is that TSFMs can accurately recover input-response relationships only when the inference context contains sufficient independent control excitation. While fine-tuning and feature smoothing offer partial improvements, the core requirement for informative control variation in the context remains, with promising initial closed-loop results for shorter contexts.
TSFMs for predictive control fail to capture system dynamics without explicit control excitation in their inference context, even with low forecasting error.
Deploying model predictive control (MPC) requires constructing or identifying a predictive model for each target system. Time-series foundation models (TSFMs) offer an attractive option thanks to strong zero-shot forecasting capabilities across systems. However, low forecast error does not guarantee that a TSFM captures the system's response to the alternative actions considered by the controller. We study this gap using residential heat-pump control as a test bed, measuring the agreement between predicted and ground-truth effects of control interventions. Importantly, we find that TSFMs can recover the system's input-response relationship when the context contains sufficient independent control excitation. Common fine-tuning pipelines and feature smoothing reduce, but do not eliminate, the need for in-context excitation. Our results indicate that current TSFMs used for predictive control require sufficiently informative control variation in the inference context. Initial closed-loop results show promise for shorter context windows.