Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multimodal Cox proportional hazards framework to address the challenges of sinkhole susceptibility prediction, specifically the lack of true negative samples and the integration of heterogeneous data modalities. By treating unreported locations as right-censored and employing modality-specific encoders with a cross-modal fusion layer, the model generates continuous, time-aware risk assessments. A statewide Florida case study validates the framework's ability to accurately rank sinkhole risk and produce a spatially informative susceptibility map.
Unreported sinkhole locations are effectively treated as right-censored, unlocking continuous, time-aware susceptibility predictions from multimodal data.
Sinkholes are a widespread geohazard in karst terrain. In Florida, soluble carbonate bedrock, shallow groundwater, and intense rainfall combine to make subsidence both common and spatially heterogeneous. Predicting where and when sinkholes will occur is difficult for two reasons. First, locations without reported sinkholes cannot be directly labeled or sampled as true negative locations. Second, the potential factors governing sinkhole risk span heterogeneous data modalities and therefore require careful integration within a unified modeling framework. We address both problems with our proposed model, a multimodal Cox proportional hazards framework for sinkhole susceptibility. Our contributions are threefold. First, we extend the proportional-hazards formulation to heterogeneous multimodal input through modality-specific encoders and a cross-modal fusion layer. Second, we treat unreported locations as right-censored rather than negative, avoiding hard-negative labeling and yielding continuous, time-aware susceptibility from the predicted survival function. Third, a statewide Florida case study with spatially blocked validation and ablation studies quantifies the benefit of multimodal integration. A Florida case study demonstrates that the proposed method effectively ranks sinkhole risk and produces a statewide susceptibility map that captures spatial variations in sinkhole occurrence.