Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the convergence patterns in asynchronous online learning communities by analyzing $\beta_0$, the number of disconnected behavioral clusters identified via Zigzag Persistent Homology, across 22 OULAD courses. The study verifies that $\beta_0$ convergence is participation-sensitive, strongly co-varying with active learner counts and responding to assessment deadlines rather than indicating genuine behavioral alignment. Key findings reveal that assessment deadlines reproducibly induce fragmentation followed by convergence, with structural fragmentation being the dominant long-term trajectory in most courses.
Asynchronous learning communities don't just fragment; they predictably fragment *before* converging around deadlines, a pattern driven by participation shifts, not just behavioral alignment.
Asynchronous online learning offers temporal flexibility at a structural cost: learning communities tend to fragment rather than cohere. $\beta_0$, the number of disconnected behavioral clusters from Zigzag Persistent Homology, serves as a cohort-level indicator of this structure. Two questions remained unverified at scale: (1) does apparent $\beta_0$ convergence reflect genuine behavioral alignment or learner dropout? and (2) do assessment deadlines produce reproducible fragmentation-convergence cycles? We address both across all 22 OULAD courses (N>22,000; 857 week-pairs). Changes in $\beta_0$ strongly co-vary with active learner changes (pooled r = 0.387; median per-course r_delta = 0.459, 20/22 courses), identifying $\beta_0$ as a participation-sensitive indicator: $\beta_0$ and active learner counts co-respond to deadline events rather than one causing the other. Deadlines produced fragmentation in 82.6% of assessments and the full Fragment First, Converge Later (FFCL) cycle in 60.2%. 3-phase analysis confirmed structural fragmentation as the dominant long-term trajectory (90.9% of courses), moderated by curriculum structure. These findings establish $\beta_0$ as a participation-sensitive structural indicator with direct implications for AI-augmented learning analytics design.